00:09:46 i'm thinking about buying a used electronic indicator setup 00:09:56 ebay always freaks me out a little 00:10:09 i should just do it and stop whining 00:23:48 Guest272 has joined #emc 00:23:58 join emc-devel 00:24:02 oops 00:24:31 Guest272 is now known as skunkworks_ 00:26:10 skunkworks_: emc2/share/axis/images/axis.ngc 00:27:27 easy enuf to make a new one with ttt 00:28:05 crap - thanks. I think I failed gnome file serching. 00:28:23 find ./ -name axis.ngc 00:29:10 actually locate works best for most things 00:29:45 you can even do regexp's and stuff 00:29:56 I was trying to use the file browser.. as I am a windows person :( 00:31:14 skunkworks has quit 00:31:57 skunkworks_ is now known as skunkworks 00:34:44 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKz81fY1OjY 00:36:46 skunkworks: cool! 00:37:05 :) 00:37:41 even though I've seen it 1000 times, it's fun to see the machine and the cone doing the same thing - your video shows that nicely 00:38:08 doesn't the comment right at the top say "not for milling"? 00:38:19 sheesh ,some people can't follow directions 00:39:03 yeah but it seems to be the first thing a lot of people cut 00:39:57 * skunkworks never notice the comment 00:40:04 noticed 00:41:17 the begining of the video chunks - oh well. people will probably think it is the machine doing it ;) 00:46:02 only for about one second here 00:46:17 right 00:47:06 my minidv worked pretty well - I think this is the first time I have used the firewire port to download the video 00:47:21 lewin1 has joined #emc 00:47:21 lewing has quit 01:05:27 EldonB46 has left #emc 01:25:22 JymmmEMC has quit 01:38:24 Realtime : http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/08/1810243 01:43:43 les_w has quit 01:49:25 fish has joined #emc 01:49:31 hello 01:49:41 Hi 01:49:54 hows everyone doing tonight 01:50:04 content 01:50:18 full of rage and bile 01:50:23 haha uh oh 01:50:35 he's always like that 01:50:44 his name gives it away 01:50:55 it's so true. 01:51:13 anyway, I have a question about linuxcnc 01:51:21 on the site, it talks about "path deviation limited to a specified tolerance" 01:51:26 anyone read this: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/08/1810243 ? 01:51:28 does that have anything to do with backlash? 01:51:52 no, it doesnt have much to do with emc at all really 01:52:30 backlash is a separate setting. 01:52:41 ok, but there is a setting for backlash right? 01:52:44 yes 01:52:50 it's called "backlash" i believe 01:52:57 harty has left #emc 01:53:06 because I'm planning to go with ACME leadscrews instead of ballscrews 01:53:16 to save some money 01:53:31 and I'm concerned about backlash 01:53:41 you should make an anti-backlash nut 01:53:54 like a split nut design eh 01:54:07 adjustable 01:54:10 etc 01:54:14 backlash comp is a bad solution. Like fenn said - try to remove it. split nut - spring loaded nut.. 01:54:19 weights 01:54:42 what's the least backlash I can get with leadscrew? 01:54:42 doesn't work for large forces, though. 01:54:46 0 01:54:53 but it involves a tremendous amount of work 01:54:58 what's a realistic number? 01:55:02 4 thou? 01:55:08 couple thousandths 01:55:21 that's pretty good 01:55:23 if you keep a split nut adjusted, it will stay pretty low 01:55:38 here is an interesting design (the white ones) http://www.aanrip.nl/abacklash2.jpg 01:55:45 thanks 01:55:54 http://www.aanrip.nl/backlashmoer2.jpg 01:55:56 how does backlash comp work exactly? 01:56:09 it knows it needs to move the screw X amount before the axis will move 01:56:20 when you change direction it advances the screw that amount 01:56:45 however consider what happens if you're doing climb milling 01:57:15 bad things! 01:57:14 the cutting forces will take up the backlash, and then you advance the screw suddenly, making a very high chip load for a brief period 01:58:05 oh I see 01:58:38 but the cutting forces don't take up the backlash consistently? 01:58:54 in climb milling the forces reverse 01:59:05 instead of pushing the axis, the machine pulls it along 01:59:11 and the screw holds it back 01:59:24 well - maybe 01:59:45 I see 02:00:03 also you can do the same sort of thing in the z axis with spiral cutters 02:00:11 an 1/8" endmill isn't going to pull the table out of backlash 02:00:50 having more than 50% cutter engagement cancels the climb pull too 02:00:58 it can 02:00:59 thats not really climb milling though 02:01:04 except at breakout 02:01:15 sure it is 02:01:37 what if you're 80% cutter engagement? 99%? 100%? what's the cuttoff point? 02:02:13 direction of cut is by is the clip thicker or thinner at the end of the cut 02:02:19 this is all over my head 02:02:27 its irrelevant 02:02:37 isnt irc great? 02:02:39 does the sieg x3 actually weight 700 lbs? 02:02:45 Skullworks-PGAB: we're talking about the cases where backlash is a problem 02:02:59 climb milling always has the thinnist clip as cutting edge departs the work 02:03:13 yes 02:03:15 climb milling is just an example of the problem being detailed 02:03:52 fish i can imagine it weight 700 lbs 02:04:05 but x2 is only 160 lbs 02:04:13 from the pictures, it doesn't seem like the x3 is that much bigger 02:04:21 X3 wighes about 390 lbs 02:04:40 shipping wieght it under 450 02:05:36 ah 02:05:39 * skunkworks would love a x1/x2 for my office.. 02:06:01 well looks like I will be getting the x2 02:06:04 skunkworks: why not go for an x3? seems a more useful size 02:06:06 x3 is too big to fit in my apartment 02:06:12 I have stuff that big 02:06:19 or access to it anyways 02:06:29 ah but what if you don't! 02:06:31 Approximate shipping weight: 372 lbs. ( from the Grizzly web sight 02:06:47 it is big 02:07:00 then I would have a bridgeport sized mill in the garage :) 02:07:14 mine is all over the house 02:07:23 bridgeport sized stuff takes.. infrastructure 02:07:30 Roguish has joined #emc 02:07:31 infrastructure == garage 02:07:34 cant just put it in a car 02:07:42 rent a wrecker 02:07:47 get some tubes 02:07:49 and a toe jack 02:07:52 yeah yeah 02:07:56 done 02:08:17 I pulled the table and saddle 02:08:29 what for? 02:08:29 removed the head & motor 02:08:36 then the column 02:08:58 so I could move it myself and fit everything in my mustang 02:09:02 oh 02:09:19 do spider couplers give backlash? 02:09:25 I've had an X3 since january 02:09:25 yes 02:09:29 danielbr has quit 02:09:38 Skullworks-PGAB: how'd you fit the knee in? 02:09:38 well 02:09:39 most do 02:09:41 damn, everything gives backlash 02:09:46 yes. 02:10:03 X3 is a mini -bed mill - there is no knee 02:10:06 Twingy has joined #emc 02:10:07 I don't understand why people like to use lovejoy couplers. 02:10:07 no, not everything 02:10:19 membrane couplers don't, preloaded ballscrews dont 02:10:20 well the steppers aren't rotating that fast, anyone have experience with just a solid piece of coupler? 02:10:36 http://images.grizzly.com/grizzlycom/pics/jpeg500/g/g0463.jpg 02:11:12 Skullworks-PGAB: oh i thought you were talking about a bridgeport 02:11:22 sorry 02:11:27 Jymmm has joined #emc 02:11:40 hmm - I thought the x3 was bigger than that for some reason. 02:12:07 Jymmm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKz81fY1OjY 02:12:28 the HF clone is 12-7/8'' (X), 5-3/4'' (Y), 8-5/8'' (Z) 18" swing 02:12:38 no - If anything I'll pick up a Hurco KM3 with ballscrews ready to go - they show up cheap from time to time - and they usually have a 3hp motor 02:15:13 Almost every part of a BP weighs more than I want to lift alone... 02:15:40 we have two horizontals at work 02:15:49 i wouldn't want to try moving one of those alone 02:15:57 i'd probably be okay moving a bridgeport with two dudes 02:16:00 manual? 02:16:02 me being one of those two dudes 02:16:05 Skullworks-PGAB: yeah 02:16:15 they're the biggest machines in the shop, 50 hp 02:16:20 * skunkworks loves horizontal machining centers - love the chip removal. 02:16:23 well, except for the planers, which are 100 02:16:24 I used to run an old Cinci 02:16:32 but the planers aren't mills 02:16:41 nor do they turn on 02:17:01 they are neat machines! 02:17:16 we have some big cutters for them 02:17:20 nobody really uses them much 02:17:36 one of the cutters is 12" diameter, 7" wide 02:17:48 can someone explain to me how this thing works? 02:17:50 stagger tooth cutter thing 02:17:50 http://www.aanrip.nl/backlashmoer2.jpg 02:17:59 I see some O-rings... 02:18:08 the o-rings provide clamping force 02:18:14 on the threads in the nut 02:18:19 which takes the backlash out 02:18:20 and that reduces backlash? 02:18:30 yeah, mostly 02:18:37 doesnt seem like a lot of clamping force 02:18:47 it's not, but you're not really going to be hogging metal off 02:19:10 well what's hogging metal off 02:19:14 supposedly the o-ring can stretch after a while with that design 02:19:28 fish, 5 horsepower cuts 02:19:33 ok 02:19:35 i would say "hogging" starts 02:19:38 so for the x2, that would work? 02:19:42 yep 02:19:41 haha 02:19:45 ok 02:19:46 here is a design that doesnt have that problem, but its more complicated: http://www.dumpstercnc.com/leadnuts.html 02:19:48 seems like a simple solution 02:20:05 I like the dumpstercnc address 02:20:07 that appeals to me 02:20:10 ha 02:20:20 me too 02:20:30 good for engraving, PCB and light routing 02:21:34 I use those nuts and they work well 02:21:38 maddash has joined #emc 02:21:39 would doing PCBs and engraving work with a CNC converted X2, assuming your piece is small enough? 02:21:52 sure, they're both mills 02:21:59 you dont need very much rigidity for pcb's 02:22:04 the x3 is just bigger and beefier 02:22:05 ok just checking 02:22:23 any backlash will kill a pcb though 02:22:27 a mill is actually probably a bad choice because the spindle doesnt go fast enough 02:22:35 you can use weights for pcb drilling 02:22:38 and get very good positioning 02:22:44 weights? 02:22:46 yar 02:22:48 maddash has quit 02:22:49 will a few thou backlash really affect pcbs? 02:22:54 to hold it in place you mean? 02:22:56 that's a trick they used on jig borers 02:23:01 they attached a line and a pulley to the table 02:23:03 and hung weights on it 02:23:11 kept the table up against the leadscrew 02:23:15 cradek: you maxnc - you made some sort of spring loaded double nuts - right? 02:23:15 ah 02:23:20 todd_ has joined #emc 02:23:24 consider that it's common to want to cut traces .006-008 wide 02:23:30 skunkworks: yes I use those dumpstercnc nuts 02:23:34 oh? 02:23:36 ah 02:23:54 todd_ has quit 02:24:10 wow ok 02:24:19 teeny! 02:24:22 so if I wanted to do pcb work, definitely go with ballscrews? 02:24:37 that's not necessary, you just need a solution for backlash 02:24:39 definately use something that takes the backlash out of the leadscrew, or go to ballscrews 02:25:18 before I got those acme screws and dumpstercnc nuts, I used a spring between two nuts on triangular threads 02:25:20 are the solutions you guys provided me enough? 02:25:24 sure 02:25:26 roltek has joined #emc 02:25:39 any of those spring/o-ring thingies will work 02:25:47 skunkworks has quit 02:25:58 for pcbs? 02:26:02 sure 02:26:03 maddash has joined #emc 02:26:07 excellent 02:26:15 * maddash just cracked wep 02:26:19 i KNOW there are people using those who are doing really light stuff in aluminum 02:26:53 why not just use bigger springs for the dumpstercnc screws 02:26:59 more wear 02:27:00 and then use 400 oz in steppers 02:27:02 higher static friction 02:27:10 wear I can deal with 02:27:18 and you still get follow error 02:27:19 just replacing the parts every once in a while 02:27:19 I've cut Al with those 02:27:30 they're not as weak as you think 02:27:33 i wonder how much bandwidth #emc takes up 02:27:34 i bet there's a point where you get more "backlash" because of stiction/elasticity in the screws 02:27:37 I was planning on doing light cuts in steel 02:27:42 fenn: yes, follow error 02:27:49 that the machine can't see 02:28:08 it will show up in cuts 02:28:19 points on a circle 02:28:33 I see 02:28:34 or rounding in sharp corners 02:28:45 if the feed changes direction at a good clip 02:29:12 you can see it if you use a scale on the table instead of the leadscrew 02:29:19 for positioning 02:29:23 well thanks for the help guys 02:29:24 good night 02:29:27 cya! 02:29:47 fish has quit 02:30:35 i guess they really hate cleaning out t-slots: http://machineshop.olin.edu/equipment/media/original/bridgeport_mill.jpg 02:30:50 doubt it ever gets used tho 02:30:56 what's the point of the t-slot? 02:31:02 mounting 02:31:08 to collect swarf so it doesnt fall on the floor 02:31:14 mounting crap to the table. 02:31:18 like, vises. 02:31:32 thats silly, if they were serious they'd just put an array of tapped holes 02:31:40 judging from the corners of that room 02:31:44 that machine indeed does not get used 02:31:47 there's a plate covering the entire tray of that bridgeport 02:31:55 i vacuum after i use the crap at work, and there's still chips stuck in the corner 02:32:11 yeah, it keeps the chips out of the slots 02:32:15 fenn: I don't think an array of tapped holes could never be as good as t-slots 02:32:22 toastydeath: magnets. 02:32:32 aluminum isn't magnetic? 02:32:46 sucks to be you 02:32:53 flush it out with oil 02:33:01 maddash: why not? 02:33:02 or just keep it out of the slots in the first place. 02:33:21 fenn: tapped hole array don't allow arbitrary positioning 02:33:23 besides the fact that everything is designed for t-slot mounting 02:33:35 there is stuff with holes 02:33:48 usually measurement stuff 02:33:57 eh? 02:33:59 t-slots allow the most rigid setup possible 02:34:10 while tapped holes are fast to use 02:34:43 master rotary tables and angle masters use tapped holes 02:34:54 why? 02:34:54 some granite surface plates have a section of holes 02:35:00 why to which part 02:35:11 why do "master" rotary tables use tapped holes? 02:35:37 two reasons - one, it's faster and you don't need t-nuts 02:35:39 because you can use locating pins in a counterbored hole? 02:35:40 fenn - given a choice between slots and holes I'd take slots every time 02:35:51 they don't want anyone using any sort of indicator 02:36:00 to try and use the slots to indicate the table in 02:36:16 no center hole, no slots, just a bunch of tapped holes in a grid 02:36:19 slots: can position clamps anywhere, easy to clean 02:36:39 holes: limit where you can put clamps, get crap and chips in them and are a bitch to clean out 02:36:48 but they're fast! 02:36:57 not when they're dirty 02:37:01 true. 02:37:03 isn't that what I said before? 02:37:07 "arbitrary positioning" 02:37:12 yes, it is 02:37:14 do they make "rotate in" nuts like for 8020, but to use on machine tables? 02:37:21 rotate in? 02:37:27 yes 02:37:44 you tilt them about 60 degrees and it slides into the slot.. err 02:37:45 tee nuts that have the corners of the flange cut off, so you can drop em into the middle of a slot 02:37:49 * fenn finds a picture 02:37:51 oh 02:37:57 as you tighten them then turn into position to grip 02:37:58 that's kind of cool 02:38:00 once 3d-printing becomes practical, machining should be mostly obsolete 02:38:07 looool 02:38:08 sorry, guys. 02:38:23 perhaps, but i'm not going to hold my breath 02:38:25 i for one welcome our laser overlords 02:39:03 * fenn gives up on finding a picture 02:39:04 it would be interesting to see a laser printer beat a progressive die 02:39:12 or see it beat a multispindle screw machine 02:39:15 lol 02:39:26 well you just gotta parallelize 02:39:35 or make the dies for either 02:39:35 don't be silly 02:39:43 but i like being silly 02:39:45 (fenn) 02:40:03 have you ever seen progressive stamping? 02:40:11 i meant for lasers 02:40:16 pew pew pew 02:40:17 but laser is the wrong way to do it anyway 02:40:27 they dont make silicon chips with lasers 02:40:35 skunkworks has joined #emc 02:40:45 cynied 02:40:47 OR DO THEY 02:40:49 cynied gas 02:41:06 damn keyboard on this portable finally died 02:41:06 cyanide? 02:41:12 yeah 02:41:17 rofl 02:41:24 jymmm: did you see the video? 02:41:26 there's more ways to etch silicon than you can shake a stick at 02:41:25 I used to work at NSC 02:41:33 it will be interesting to see if 3d printing in metals ever makes stuff faster than traditional machining 02:41:35 skunkworks: yeah, cool 02:42:03 it certainly won't make stuff fast enough in plastics to beat mold injection 02:42:11 well it depends on the shape 02:42:26 holy crap: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_YnaHNcISw 02:42:40 hahah i saw that 02:42:46 i cringed 02:43:30 they are sitting IN the fscking press! 02:43:47 lets see what happens when the management decides to raise production rates 02:44:02 jeez 02:44:23 the back guy leans out from under it to get the next piece just as it comes down 02:44:30 the very fact that they can affort to have about 8 guys loading and unloading a single press boggles the mind 02:44:44 relatives of the owner 02:44:44 compared to the cost of that die 02:44:52 it's nothing 02:45:12 they still load dies like that by hand here, too 02:45:14 oh come on, it looks like a food pan or something 02:45:15 Gaqwd lets hope you never have to sneeze 02:45:22 fenn: 02:45:34 that's probably a half million to three quarter million dollar die 02:45:45 doesn't matter that it's dog pans 02:45:51 the size of it is what determines the cost 02:45:57 toastydeath: they only load by hand for fairly short runs 02:46:07 if it was volume they'd have some kind of automation 02:46:11 not necessarily, man 02:46:20 dmessier has quit 02:47:04 the cost of manpower to run the die is small compared to maitnence, and is completely puny compared to the profit generated by it 02:47:09 even loaded by hand, every part 02:47:30 high speed presses are autofed, sure 02:47:42 but slow ones like that, it still makes sense to load them by hand 02:47:48 hmm - looks like $17 + $20 shipping will get me a keyboard on ebay ;) 02:47:52 like I said, it depends on the run size 02:48:01 even for a million parts, dude 02:49:48 I find it hard to believe an american company would do a run of a million of anything with manual loading 02:50:45 some places just don't use automation. 02:51:11 i've got aquaintences who just retired from the die industry, working on large production dies 02:51:13 continual jobs 02:51:18 places that make a million of something do, or they see the job go to china, or a competitor that does 02:51:51 and again, that's a generalization 02:52:01 automation is the darling of trade magazines 02:52:07 not necessarily actual shops 02:52:26 roltek has quit 02:52:26 plenty of places do it, plenty of places don't 02:52:38 I don't neccessarily means robots and such 02:53:20 what do you mean, then 02:53:32 ppl sitting in a press machine 02:53:36 no robots required 02:53:45 people don't sit in the die here in america 02:53:50 mechanical feeders, pneumatic widgets, transfer lines 02:53:54 they wait for the die to open, go over, pull the thing out, and move it 02:54:02 someone else drops the new sheet in 02:54:35 I saw a press making rocker arms at the Ford engine plant here - about one stroke per second, flat blanks in one end, rocker arms out the other 02:54:48 yeah, that's also common 02:54:51 about 10 stages of transfer in the press, all pretty much mechanical 02:55:10 that is not, strictly speaking, an automated press 02:55:13 nfw humans could do that, chinese or otherwise 02:55:55 it sure ain't manual 02:56:15 autmated presses are ones with robots to load and unload sheets 02:56:23 the only operation action was to dumb huge bins of blanks into one hopper and remove hoppers of finished parts (forklift driver did that) 02:56:28 and automatically lubricate the die, make sure it wasn't double fed, et cetera 02:56:52 ok, no wonder we're arguing - we have different definitions of automated 02:57:14 i'd say automated is when you dont have a guy pressing a button 02:57:14 yeah 02:57:29 those presses still have human attendants, is what i am saying 02:57:31 even the high speed ones 02:57:55 to load the rolls into the die, et cetera 02:57:58 and hit "go" 02:58:04 and wait for the roll to run out 02:58:09 right, but they don't handle every part 02:58:15 right 02:58:25 screw machines aren't automated 02:58:33 you should see the 12 station rotary dies that makes machine gun belt links... 02:59:00 automated vs automatic 02:59:05 right 02:59:08 automatic has a guy pressing a button 02:59:15 ribbon sheet in - links FLY out - 1100 a minute 02:59:15 that press was not automatic 02:59:32 * skunkworks still likes watching how chain is made. 02:59:36 lol 03:00:42 Ziegler has quit 03:02:22 i like rolling mills 03:02:44 big stuff there 03:02:53 srs 03:03:30 i know some of you guys were interested in error compensation 03:03:38 does emc has compensation maps or something? 03:03:40 for work I had to go the LTV steel rolling mill in Cleveland - there was over 100,000HP of motors in one room 03:03:47 hahaha 03:03:47 yes, emc2 can do screw error comp 03:03:57 like, how so? 03:04:06 is it a lookup table 03:04:09 or like a per-inch error 03:04:14 read the find manual for details, but yes, its a table 03:04:17 cool 03:04:17 up to 256 points 03:04:25 that was all i wanted to know 03:04:29 ty 03:04:31 you enter the nominal, and either the actual or correction, for forward and reverse 03:04:53 (so it can also correct for backlash, even lash that is not uniform over the length of the screw) 03:05:16 it interpolates, right? (doesn't step) 03:05:22 right 03:05:34 linear or some kind of curve fit? 03:06:13 toast_ has joined #emc 03:06:14 toastydeath has quit 03:06:17 arrrgh 03:06:20 (rtfs?) 03:06:26 linear 03:06:30 rtfs? 03:06:29 awallin has joined #emc 03:06:37 i missed a big chunk of something i think 03:06:39 oh well 03:06:46 what's the command to ask the bot for the log 03:07:00 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqKvYUO7C7w&mode=related&search= 03:08:04 logger_emc: log 03:08:08 logger_emc: bookmark 03:08:08 Just this once .. here's the log: http://www.linuxcnc.org/irc/irc.freenode.net:6667/emc/2007-08-09.txt 03:08:18 ty 03:08:44 linear is a good way to do it 03:09:04 best fit curves have shown to have poorer performance in experementation 03:09:40 blight_ has quit 03:09:48 the adjustments are usually small, the variation in adjustment from one point to the next is even smaller 03:10:02 so the change from one very small slope to another very small slope is nothing to worry about 03:11:11 indeed 03:11:39 and even then, best fit tends to generate a larger true position error than linear methods do 03:15:22 jmkasunich: where you running your geckos directly from the printer port initially - or did you only hook them up to the mesa card? 03:16:23 geckos almost always require a breakout board 03:16:28 I think I ran them from the parport 03:16:45 I definitely ran them using software stepping with the 5i20 simply action as an I/O board 03:17:01 s/action/acting/ 03:17:27 I think I'm gonna do something smart for a change and go to bed early 03:17:28 night folks 03:17:35 Night 03:19:36 I think I am going to call it a night also. 03:19:37 night 03:19:37 pew pew pew 03:19:40 cya! 03:19:46 does anyone who is left know how shipping works on ebay 03:20:05 i am looking at this indicator and the seller says shipping is 12 bucks or so, but it's not included in the buy it now price 03:20:35 you add the shipping to the buy it now price.. that's the total 03:20:44 if the shipping price is specified, it'll get added in at checkout time 03:20:55 it will probably show up when you check out. 03:20:56 right 03:21:13 if it's not specified and there's not a way to calculate it on the page (like entering your zipcode) the seller probably screwed up 03:21:32 it's a flat rate so i hope it will be in the total 03:21:39 yeah it'll work then 03:21:40 ty folks 03:21:51 skunkworks has quit 03:25:20 jesus 03:25:33 electronic levels are more expensive than autocollimators 03:31:12 maddash has quit 04:18:51 awallin has left #emc 04:26:04 Twingy has quit 05:00:28 toast_ has quit 05:14:05 Roguish has quit 06:28:33 erdizz has joined #emc 07:05:48 lewin1 has quit 07:06:17 lewing has joined #emc 09:12:24 Martzis has quit 09:57:07 Jymmm has quit 09:59:49 Skullworks-PGAB: Why do they require a breakout board? 12:08:23 skunkworks has joined #emc 12:15:44 Skullworks-PGAB: hey.. 12:16:01 Skullworks-PGAB: I read your earlier message why do you require a breakout board for geckos? 12:16:10 a-l-p-h-a2 has joined #emc 12:16:50 a-l-p-h-a has quit 12:16:51 a-l-p-h-a2 is now known as a-l-p-h-a 12:18:21 me? 12:18:39 yeah 12:19:01 whom05:19 < Skullworks-PGAB> geckos almost always require a breakout board 12:19:07 or someone :) 12:19:08 I am running the parker drives directly from the printer port. No issues. 12:19:17 me too 12:19:18 yes - it was him that said that 12:19:26 I just wanted to know why he said that.. 12:19:33 they work great from the parport.. 12:19:52 did you see my video? 12:19:55 no 12:20:10 Jymmm winding him up about breakouts? 12:20:16 oh 12:20:27 he seems to like em 12:20:28 someone should beat sense into him with a stick. 12:20:35 a big one 12:20:37 yeah.. 12:20:50 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKz81fY1OjY 12:20:59 I dont get what the big problem is, I mean making parts is what im interested in with a cnc... 12:21:22 I have not blown out a printer port yet.. :) 12:21:39 geckos are optoisolated.. 12:21:41 :) 12:21:47 heh 12:21:48 so are the parkers 12:21:58 then they dont need a thing 12:22:03 yep 12:22:35 :) 12:23:04 he does seem to worry his little head about the wrong things 12:24:04 yeah 12:24:26 he is a 'over doer':) 12:26:22 well,:/ 12:27:07 but we let robin take care of that ;) 12:27:13 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AMZlDHwebw&mode=related&search= 12:27:22 _nice_ cut 12:29:03 I dont have any sound right now so I cant hear how it sounds 12:30:05 sounds nice 12:31:57 archivist_win has joined #emc 12:32:23 uh oh - his evil twin 12:32:34 * archivist copies to self to look http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AMZlDHwebw&mode=related&search= 12:35:53 thats not messing about! 12:36:18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKz81fY1OjY 12:37:03 :) 12:38:07 jepler pointed out that the comment at the top of the 'EMC2 AXIS' program says 'not for milling' ;) 12:38:39 :) 12:38:57 I never noticed that 12:39:06 steppers are nearly as noisy as the cutting head 12:39:26 or - the cutting head is pretty quiet.. 12:39:54 or the microphone was near the steppers 12:40:14 The 2 S6 drives are definatly a bit noisier than the OEM650 drives. The S6 drives are a bit older. 12:40:25 the microphone was on the cam corder 12:41:16 I am going to use all OEM650's but I need to make a power supply. I grabbed 2 of the S6 drives as they have power supplies internally. 12:41:54 seem to work just fine though :) 12:42:36 you can see at the end of the video - I pan behind the engraver - the 2 big black boxes are the S6 drives and the small grey thing is the OEM650. 12:47:01 :) 12:48:03 I want to cut steel like that. 12:48:19 yeah that was good 12:48:36 * anonimasu is still struggling to get good cuts 12:48:47 im too scared of chiploads ;) 12:49:03 a good solid machine is needed for that sort of cut 12:49:12 yeah 12:50:56 hm I need to cad this roller throttle body idea out.. 12:50:57 cad/cam 12:53:40 skunkworks, design issue with the bridge http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6938245.stm 12:55:04 gnix_oag has joined #emc 12:55:14 interesting. 12:55:47 hello 12:56:16 I thought it was standard to load test when built almost like they were when repairing 12:59:24 jmkasunich_ has joined #emc 13:01:02 jmkasunich has quit 13:01:19 gnix_oag has quit 13:32:12 blight_ has joined #emc 14:12:35 Martzis has joined #emc 14:33:58 JymmmEMC has joined #emc 15:07:50 It's too quiet in here 15:09:22 hm 15:09:23 yeah 15:09:25 * anonimasu is happy 15:09:39 I got the mill at work to interpolate corners.. 15:10:03 short line segments, with < 10 degrees of direction change 15:10:14 cool beans 15:10:23 so im going to try doing some 3d contouring at it someday 15:11:21 I got kind of pissed off last time I tried because it'd exact stop :) 15:11:39 exact stop instead of contoure? 15:11:46 yeah 15:12:03 it's not the most amazing control out there but it works well 15:12:11 heidenhain tnc-310 15:12:15 Sorry to say it, but I wish that was the worse of my troubles. 15:12:54 :/ 15:13:13 stupid old machine has less then 0.001 of backslash. 15:13:17 mm 15:13:33 that's awesome 15:13:55 one of the axes has 0.004 15:14:06 I think the screw's more worn there 15:14:13 that's still damn good :) 15:14:20 Replace the balls 15:14:51 nah 15:15:16 * bill2or3 nods off. 15:15:24 that's be overkill 15:15:51 :) 15:15:59 Gawd I love PS 15:16:02 ps? 15:16:08 PS == PostScript 15:16:16 PS != EPS 15:16:24 sorry, didnt mean to brag or anything.. it's just so cool with a machine that's damn old :) 15:16:48 anonimasu: Oh no, it's all good.... That's awesome for brand new too! 15:16:56 that is cool. has it just not been used much, or is it really that durable? 15:17:07 it's durable I guess 15:17:13 though the control has been replaced a few years back 15:17:24 I wish I had any time to do machining. 15:17:27 anonimasu: that's the easy part=) 15:17:27 stupid baby. 15:17:30 so they might have replaced screws and stuff :) 15:17:35 im trying to learn 15:17:39 ok, maybe not stupid, but still. 15:17:44 LOL @ bill2or3.... you play, you pay! 15:17:52 yep. 15:18:08 does anyone know polish? 15:18:14 http://cadcam.fme.vutbr.cz/?page=heidenhain&sub1=labyrint 15:18:32 of course, poland is a huge country, they all speak it over there. 15:18:36 :-) 15:18:41 bill2or3: Say it with me.... CON-DOM 15:19:02 nah Jymm, it was planned, but that doesn't mean I'm any less exhausted. 15:19:02 I want to know what that part is 15:19:35 bill2or3: So, you PLANNED to have a stupid baby huh? I think you need to fire your planners =) 15:20:08 totally. 15:20:09 whats the G code for baby 15:20:11 * bill2or3 fires himself. 15:20:23 that part is pretty cool :) 15:20:25 anonimasu, interesting part, if you figure out what it is, tell me. 15:20:55 i trying to 15:21:34 it's czech.. 15:22:15 I think it's a labyrinth seal 15:22:31 or something 15:22:40 or a mold for something 15:27:28 http://pastebin.ca/651187 15:28:01 some of the other pages there show what looks like parts of a rotary engine 15:28:07 perhaps it's related to that. 15:28:11 hm,, 15:28:14 maybe.. 15:29:15 anonimasu: That be PS, so easy to use/edit even in text form 15:30:49 * anonimasu nods 15:31:43 I love the fact that's really a programming language too. 15:31:51 this will translate it, kind of. http://www.translation-guide.com/free_online_translators.php?from=English&to=Czech 15:32:53 but it still doesn't tell me what the part is. 15:33:48 LOL, convert it to PDF and it's only 821 Bytes!!!! 15:34:25 it looks very similar to a labyrinth seal 15:34:46 I dont know what that is. 15:34:49 * bill2or3 googles 15:34:54 and the title of the page is near enough for me 16:37:11 toast has joined #emc 16:41:16 Guest187 has joined #emc 16:53:12 skunkworks has quit 16:57:09 i recieved the most crushing news at work today 16:57:18 we apparently were all set up to own the LODTM, from lawerence livermore 16:57:26 OWN 16:57:27 at our shop 16:57:35 but couldn't afford the move 16:58:33 at least we know the folks who are getting it 16:58:34 and can go visit =( 17:02:25 Guest187 has quit 17:03:51 maddash has joined #emc 17:11:17 skunkworks has joined #emc 17:15:09 maddash has quit 17:29:08 archivist_win has quit 17:50:31 maddash has joined #emc 17:52:52 :/ 18:05:05 feoc has joined #emc 18:13:04 maddash has quit 18:14:07 EldonB46 has joined #emc 18:24:31 The_Ball has quit 18:30:55 lewin1 has joined #emc 18:34:56 pew pew pew 18:47:17 lewing has quit 18:49:49 lewin1 has quit 18:58:38 does anyone know about the bridgeport boss-8 (says R2E3 on the front)? 18:59:33 nab! 19:01:45 jone had posted some info on them.. let me look. I think it is steppers. 19:02:16 this one is definitely servo 19:02:25 X Axis 30" Y Axis 15" 19:02:28 Quill Travel (Z) 5" Knee Travel 13" 19:02:31 Horse Power 2 3 Phase 19:02:35 ^^ the intarwebs gives this information 19:02:48 for one thing I wonder if it has encoders 19:03:05 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-9643.html says it homes to an index pulse 19:03:08 BOSS 3 through 6 are stepper. Only the BOSS 7 amd 8 are 19:03:15 servo. Then there's the R2Ex series, etc 19:03:19 jepler: ah, nice find 19:04:44 here's a bridgeport that's actually *in* bridgeport .. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290038162008 19:04:47 there's a couple of these machines very nearby but the guy is very "optimistic" about their value 19:04:50 says it's boss 8 with "nc400 servos" 19:05:17 I hate 'optimistic' 19:05:38 cradek: did you buy the servo interface for the mesa card? 19:05:55 skunkworks: nope 19:07:07 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-26311.html 19:07:08 definitely encoders 19:07:11 that's nice 19:08:12 maybe it's tach + encoder 19:08:37 hm 19:16:57 sweet. are you hoping to use the boss controller? ;) 19:17:05 EldonB46 has quit 19:17:42 x3rox has joined #emc 19:17:51 EldonB46 has joined #emc 19:26:54 skunkworks: part of the reason he's so "optimistic" is that the controllers are still working 19:27:47 not that I care about that... 19:28:22 I wish someone could tell me if I can use the motors, encoders, amps, etc as-is - that really would add a lot to what it would be worth to spend on it 19:35:59 steve-0mega has joined #emc 19:36:10 steve-0mega has left #emc 19:37:10 cradek: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/message/72541 19:37:43 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/message/6222 19:37:53 looks like +/- 10v 19:39:13 thanks 19:39:19 that's good news 19:39:53 #emacs emcfreqmot.c 19:39:57 Scroll down until you find a line that says: 19:39:58 static int PERIOD=20;/* fundamental period for time interrupt */ 19:40:01 ... holy cow 19:42:24 looks like Jon E knows a lot about these machines, maybe I should talk to him 19:42:25 (maybe that's what his is) 19:43:23 could be 19:45:29 cradek: is that how you used to have to change BASE_PERIOD? 19:45:32 the period was hard coded at one point? 19:45:38 yep 19:45:40 bleh 19:45:42 apparently in 2000 19:46:05 New in 15-Mar-2000: 19:46:10 So, PERIOD = 0.0000167 sets the frequency task period to 16.7 19:46:10 microseconds, equivalent to the original "static int PERIOD = 20" that 19:46:10 was hard-coded in C. 19:46:38 that wasn't that long ago.. you guys have come a long way. 19:47:11 before my time... 19:49:15 sounds like they are noisy - low pwm freqency 19:49:35 better than steppers... 19:49:48 right - I would be able to put up with it :) 19:50:03 I am good at ignoring things. 19:50:37 the original control rapids at 250 19:51:20 nice 19:51:29 I wonder what the max contouring is 19:52:00 like our laser is like 100ipm cutting - 400ipm rapids 19:52:16 I think he drip feeds from a PC, so it might stop after each move 19:52:27 he wasn't real clear about it 19:57:23 depends on how many blocks it can read in at a time. 20:11:07 alex___ has joined #emc 20:17:13 feoc has quit 20:17:29 feoc has joined #emc 20:31:28 good read http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/geckodrive/message/12405 20:34:01 omfg.. 20:34:04 I hate cnczone so much 20:34:13 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41553&page=3 20:34:22 DUDE I AM MAKING HELIKOPT3R PARTS! 20:34:44 uh 20:34:57 fuck it. 20:35:07 if someone sets out to build a cam measuring machine and fails 20:35:09 they are idiots 20:35:19 yeah.. 20:35:20 it's a damn simple thing 20:35:50 making a CNC version would add complexity, though 20:35:52 but that guy NC_CAMS turned it(like all other fscking threads he's involved into into a "IM THE L33T CAMGRINDER" 20:35:56 toast: cnc? 20:36:02 non-analog 20:36:12 toast: measure/rotate the cam measure jerk/acceleration and lift.. 20:36:22 I mean, it's a rotart to linear translation.. 20:36:25 and a angle encoder.. 20:36:43 no - it is way more complicated then that ;) 20:36:56 the stuff that measures accurately 20:37:00 is kind of nonlinear 20:37:13 so you could get a general overview of the cam that way, yes 20:37:41 but you'd need a function generator and a differential probe 20:37:50 and, a spindle, natch 20:37:57 toast: I'm not following.. 20:38:04 ha ha cam joke 20:38:08 "i'm not following!" 20:38:10 anyway 20:38:14 toast: the commerical cam measurement machines has a probe(roller) that goes on top of the cam. 20:38:19 and a angle encoder for the rotation of the cam.. 20:38:21 :)= 20:38:24 yeah 20:38:32 like i alluded to 20:38:38 it depends on how accurately you want to measure the cam 20:38:47 couple tenths, that's an awesome way to do it 20:38:53 tenths! 20:39:00 that's huge. 20:39:34 i'm telling you how the followers work when they need to be more accurate than that 20:39:52 it doesn't just follow the cam, because the equipment that measures more accurate than tenths is nonlinear 20:40:07 so it requires a little more fenagling 20:40:09 is that how you spell that? 20:40:13 fenagling? 20:40:25 yeah, apparently it is 20:41:10 toast: encoders are linear afaik.. 20:41:27 hmm i think art fenerty is full of crap 20:41:27 they're not using encoders 20:41:34 to measure the linear distance past tenths 20:41:41 LVDT's, capacetence sensors, etc 20:42:12 there are a couple ways to get that kind of measurement, but it all kind of sucks 20:42:34 fenn: He didn't seem to be slamming emc - that atleast counts for something 20:43:31 well its hard to slam someone else when your software is obviously inferior 20:43:34 hahahah 20:43:41 ouch :) 20:43:49 I wonder why people are so scared to just try it - it's free after all 20:44:15 toast: yeah, there are lots of ways to measure, though good/cheap.. 20:44:37 good/cheap/quick 20:44:43 the whole pick two thing. 20:44:49 I have some 0-20mm inductive sensors ;) 20:44:56 analog out. 20:44:55 :p 20:45:00 i still love analog 20:45:04 if you have a 16 bit adc.. 20:45:11 we have analog amps 20:45:16 for that kind of gear 20:45:19 they're very versatile 20:45:27 that gives you 20/65535 mm 20:45:55 ofcourse not optimal for doing that kind of thing ;) 20:46:10 what kind of thing 20:46:19 a analog inductive sensor.. 20:46:33 for measuring cams? 20:46:37 or for digitizing 20:46:40 yeah 20:46:58 why not? 20:47:08 * anonimasu is mostly pissed off because of the attitude.. 20:47:27 pew pew pew! 20:47:33 analog lasers! 20:47:43 I mean, if someone wants to build something and you keep talking about your buisness 20:47:45 and how much better you do it.. 20:48:08 *sigh* 20:49:10 =( 20:49:32 ok, measuring a cam, how is that hard? 20:49:43 measuring it accurately is hard 20:50:11 unless you spend a lot of money using tools that are linear over the entire cam's throw 20:50:48 how bout a dial indicator 20:50:56 how about a encoder? 20:51:04 and a lever.. 20:51:07 a dial indicator _with_ an encoder :) 20:51:09 yeah.. 20:51:29 lol. 20:51:50 for anyone in home shop machining that would need to make their own cam, both of those methods would work! 20:52:46 make an eccentric EMC measuring machine 20:52:55 i guess if feeler gauges are "yardsticks" then so are gauge blocks 20:53:07 ? 20:53:14 well, or just buying a lvdt.. 20:53:28 Our linear encoders break a lift down to millionths of an inche. Do we need to do it that fine? Probably not. Then again, some guys measure piston clearance with yard sticks (feeler gages), some use micrometers to 0.001" and others to 0.0001". How accurate do you want/need to be? 20:53:31 my reseller selld ones down to 1.5um.. 20:53:39 sells.. 20:53:42 and this brings me back to my poing about nonlinearity 20:53:49 LVDTs are ridiculously nonlinear 20:53:50 0.2% linearity.. 20:54:08 .2% over the entire envelope? 20:54:31 yes 20:54:39 is that total error along the entire measure 20:54:49 or is that at the two limits 20:55:31 0,3% is standard 20:55:34 0,2% is optional 20:55:40 because that's .0005" over the travel 20:55:40 http://www.hemomatik.com/bild_pdf/Oversikt/59/SM_LVe1_h.pdf 20:56:06 and that's not very linear for something outputting in micrometers 20:56:33 toast: that's 0.0127mm.. 20:57:11 a .25" lvdt 20:57:18 with .2% linearity 20:57:31 has five tenths of error 20:57:58 if that lvdt is outputting millionths, which is almost assuredly is, that's five hundred units of measurement 20:58:01 in error 20:59:06 that's a specific case with one of our LVDTs 20:59:06 at work. 20:59:09 * anonimasu nods 20:59:18 that's what i am saying, nonlinear 20:59:32 because you can resolve at millionths, but you can't use it as a length measure 20:59:44 unless of course you hook it up to something like EMC 20:59:52 and do an error map and correct it digitally. 21:00:13 well, you end up doing that for any measurement... 21:00:31 not in the same way 21:00:44 LVDT error maps look like a drunken college student trying to find their way home 21:00:50 ok 21:00:55 there's no real coherence for it, is what i'm saying 21:01:04 not that it's an inherently DIFFERENT kind of error map 21:01:17 just that a lot more points are necessary 21:01:43 yep 21:01:43 than say, leadscrew errors. 21:02:54 * anonimasu nods 21:03:18 pew pew pew! 21:03:38 anonimasu: your mentioned http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=329418&postcount=30 21:03:44 :) 21:04:34 i think if you looked in the books, you'd know how to interpret the data 21:04:44 that's the cool thing about reading, there's usually related information in books 21:04:45 heh 21:04:51 where does the nonlinearity come from btw? 21:05:02 the coils 21:05:11 physical inaccuracy in the coils? 21:05:12 they're not uniform 21:05:14 yeah 21:05:16 is it consistant nonlinearity - or does it change each time? 21:05:19 and you have three of them 21:05:22 oh, it's ultra-consistant 21:05:31 ah - then just map it once. 21:05:36 they make awesome dial test indicators 21:05:35 so you can use it to measure position to within a millionth? 21:05:36 for that reason 21:05:43 fenn: if you correct them, yes 21:05:51 jmkasunich_ has quit 21:05:59 but you really do need a very dense error map 21:06:02 skunkworks: the same guy runs in/out at all threads with IC discussion talking about how _great_ he's skills are.. 21:06:05 :) 21:06:10 jmkasunich_ has joined #emc 21:06:33 im sure he really are.. but it's not like you have to tell everyone about it 21:06:45 and also temperature control 21:06:53 and all the other crap that goes along with millionth measurement 21:07:06 you could probably get .00002-3 in a home shop environment with a little work 21:07:13 and an error map 21:07:27 anonimasu: did you read the tread in emc? where he had no clue what emc could do - but was sure it wasn't good enough 21:07:28 without spending too much money 21:07:33 skunkworks: yes 21:08:16 kill him with kindness I say 21:08:36 ah well, I'll just ignore it.. 21:08:44 I think I should kill my cnczone user someday soon 21:08:49 kill him with an EMC voltron 21:10:56 don't you like the mach biased message board? ;) 21:11:38 heh 21:11:40 no 21:12:02 i'm very very tempted to write back 21:13:06 "I hope you realize that you already told us about yourself at several other places at this board", and that hobbyists have vastly different requirements then professional teams do. 21:14:59 but, it's not worth the pain. 21:15:45 you know nc-cams has tons of supporters.. So it would be a loosing battle. 21:16:01 yep 21:17:02 I guess he's yet another engine builder. 21:17:08 they are all kind of odd ;) 21:18:35 skunkworks: btw http://www.audietech.com/ 21:18:58 :) 21:19:44 he had mentioned that company I think 21:19:55 yeah 21:21:00 lerneaen_hydra has joined #emc 21:22:11 fish has joined #emc 21:22:31 Hey fish 21:22:57 howdy 21:23:00 i'm back with more questions :) 21:23:01 How is the backlash work coming? 21:23:12 I think I'm gonna go with ballscrews actually 21:23:18 because they're cheaper than I thought 21:23:38 hmmm - cheap and zero backlash ball screws normally don't go togather.. 21:24:09 hehe 21:24:10 no 21:24:38 well not zero backlash 21:24:43 ah 21:24:50 the ones on homeshopcnc 21:25:47 he claims the standard nut/screw has a backlash of 1-4 thou 21:26:03 If I where to make a machine with cheap ball screws - I would use 2 nuts and preload them with belvel springs. But that is just my crazy talk. 21:26:10 so the preloaded ones are even better than that 21:26:28 preloaded ballscrews if done right - have no backlash 21:26:53 * anonimasu nods 21:27:03 or you could get oversize balls and load them 21:27:10 i've read some good things about homeshopcnc 21:27:18 until you end up at a reasonable level or precision 21:27:22 though that's lab work almost 21:27:45 I have no experience with home shopcnc stuff 21:28:02 they seem to be the cheapest source for ballscrew 21:28:05 and mcmaster 21:28:58 anyone know how long the Z-axis screw on the x2 would have to be? 21:29:12 skunkworks: btw.. 21:29:38 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-38452.html 21:30:23 skunkworks: nice project :) 21:30:39 heh - I read that tread a bit. 21:30:43 thread 21:31:08 :) 21:31:11 he's there too 21:31:29 fish: I don't know of anyone that has an x2 on here. maybe jonE but he isn't on here much at all. 21:31:55 what kinda mills do y'all have? 21:32:44 http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/DSCCurrent.JPG 21:32:50 haha 21:32:53 http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/DSCgantry.JPG 21:33:06 http://www.electronicsam.com/images/engraver/engraver.JPG 21:33:28 jeeze 21:33:30 you dont' mess around 21:33:31 x3rox has quit 21:33:54 the first one isn't running at the moment. It is going to be converted to emc22 21:33:59 or emc2 even 21:34:25 * fenn gets the whip 21:34:37 yah yah - I am slow 21:34:41 :) 21:34:52 lol 21:34:55 i want that thing rigid tapping by friday 21:35:01 I can't wait. 21:35:08 that thing is going to be a beast 21:35:19 compared to its functionallity before 21:35:26 skunkworks: 20cm cuts in steel ;) 21:35:26 frrrrrp 21:36:14 we have ripped a bunch with it. 10" facing mill and such 21:36:20 hehe 21:36:36 well - I have to drive home. BBL 21:36:41 what are you going to make with it? 21:36:58 got any plans? 21:37:04 I don't understand the question.. ;) 21:37:20 or do you just want it? 21:37:24 There is stuff I want to make - large stirling engine and such 21:37:32 skunkworks: cool 21:37:33 hehe 21:37:41 _large_ is relative :) 21:37:42 what type of sterling? 21:38:15 I want to start with a 4 cylinder - where the hot from one gets fed into the cold of the next. 21:38:29 oh, four stage 21:38:34 right 21:38:55 I have to take pictures of the solar collector yet.. 21:38:56 I take it you have a regenerator on each stage? 21:39:26 Yes - probably experiementing initially with stainless wool 21:40:02 and going from there - I have piston shape ideas also. - to transfer the heat better 21:40:11 hmm I see 21:40:26 but - remember I like to wing it. 21:40:27 which temperatures (or delta temp actually) are you going to run? 21:40:32 wing it? 21:40:36 skunkworks: maybe you should ask nc_cams about it :) 21:40:43 skunkworks: im sure he has some good input on pistons 21:40:44 oh - good idea 21:40:48 :) 21:40:58 I will be back later. 21:41:45 lerneaen_hydra: ambient and 120 square foot of sunlight to begin with 21:42:01 what medium to transfer the heat? 21:42:08 sodium? 21:42:12 or something less exotic? 21:42:46 nothing that exotic - to begin with - I am putting the hot side into the focal point of the solar collector 21:43:03 oh, it's a reflective collector 21:43:04 the cold side will be cooled with water. 21:43:17 how are you going to focus on all four heads? 21:43:28 Martzis has left #emc 21:43:29 got a lake nearby? 21:43:36 heh - no 21:44:12 nice and fast: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2285657714531903438 21:44:40 all 4 heads will be in the same focal point (same assembly) 21:45:37 skunkworks: huh? 21:46:28 let me find a picture 21:57:14 erdizz has quit 21:58:05 hmm - not finding one.. BBL 21:58:07 skunkworks has quit 22:05:22 roltek has joined #emc 22:23:42 pew pew pew 22:23:44 feoc has quit 22:23:59 feoc has joined #emc 22:26:44 skunkworks has joined #emc 22:30:47 lerneaen_hydra: like this in effect http://www.whispergen.com/main/wobbleyoke/ 22:31:26 and this http://www.whispergen.com/main/stirlingcycle/ 22:31:32 the second flash down 22:33:47 skunkworks: oh, I see 22:34:00 so no middle piston 22:34:03 that's quite a neat setup 22:34:33 right - sort of 'double acting' 22:35:15 what size are we talking about 22:35:22 over or under 10kw? 22:35:28 I don't really know yet.. 22:35:32 under 22:41:00 I have a mosfet with a top row 'M T' Next row 'P2955E' bottom row R404 M < motorola symbol 22:41:15 The 9 Maybe a g? 22:41:21 I can't find anything on it. 22:41:39 heh 22:41:49 *reading the thread about emc with nccams involved.. 22:43:45 I think I got it. 22:43:49 12a 60v 22:43:59 anonimasu: link to thread 22:44:02 anonimasu: funny huh 22:44:24 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40309&highlight=nc_cams 22:44:34 ty 22:45:44 it's hillarious 22:50:04 I kind of think the discussion misses the whole point.. 22:50:07 ;p 22:50:19 also, who said that integration is simple.. 22:52:35 why does that one guy ramble about cars for like twenty minutes every post 22:52:51 toast: because he knows he's shit. 22:55:06 lol 22:56:27 dude... that thread's... insane 22:56:48 lerneaen_hydra: I managed to piss him off in another thread :D 22:56:52 that's why we are at it.. 22:56:56 haha, sweet 22:56:59 what are you called there? 22:57:00 <- is atleast 22:57:02 an0n 22:57:21 http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=329418&postcount=30 22:57:26 the other thread 22:58:20 * skunkworks samco 22:58:47 this nccams dude is like 22:58:51 an idiot 22:58:56 like, i am an idiot 22:59:00 and i know this guy is a bigger idiot than i am 22:59:35 * lerneaen_hydra seconds toast 22:59:48 err. the bit about nccams 22:59:59 * anonimasu is kind of disturbed at him 23:00:33 lerneaen_hydra: ahhaha 23:00:39 ty for the clarification =) 23:00:41 We have and see them in our masters du to the logic we use to cut them (point to point milling as oppsed to curve fitting - we've tried both, long story). Via hand lapping and polishing, we get around the issues. Why bother? CNC ground masters take 7-10 days plus 1-2 days shipping and cost 2-3 time what it costs us to do them ourself - we get ours in 24-48 hours and they are made on site. 23:01:23 uys have tried to use step/direction to operate cam and OD grinders over the years. You can literally "see" the difference in the finish between a servo controlled grinder and a S/D controlled grinder. 23:01:32 well, woohoo what a fucking relevation 23:01:40 s/d? 23:01:41 O_o 23:01:46 step/dir 23:01:57 and that has nothing to do with the input_scale, noo 23:02:03 haha 23:02:20 I should add him to my buddy list 23:02:24 have a 1:1000 timing belt and I promise you it'll be good enough 23:02:28 :) 23:02:51 agreed 23:03:08 the movement by touching the table will be greater than a couple steps 23:03:22 :9 23:03:36 well, obviously you shouldnt use step/dir on a ultra precise machine 23:04:19 of course, still it's not a flaw of step/dir 23:04:26 HAHA WTF "HOw you get counts per rev to mean something takes programming and math/calculus skills that not a lot of people posess. Heck, a lot of people don't even know what differentiation means let alone how to do it." 23:04:36 dude, seriously 23:05:04 why do servos jitter 23:05:28 the jitter is dependant on the accuracy of the encoder 23:05:34 oh 23:05:33 toast: because you have two phases, and no place for them to reach equillibrum.. 23:05:46 as it needs to move a bit before it knows it's in the wrong place 23:05:51 and a encoder with counts it bounced between 23:05:51 then it pushes it back again 23:06:17 oh 23:06:20 err, s/accuracy/number of counts per rev 23:06:25 lerneaen_hydra: hope that made any sense too 23:06:27 :) 23:06:28 now this is kind of tangental but still related 23:06:35 whats all this about jitter? why not just set your deadband correctly 23:06:39 anonimasu: yeah, got it 23:06:58 having said the encoder issue, someone mentioned being able to use encoderless servos and use a different input 23:06:59 fenn: that dosent keep your motors from bouncing between counts or does it? 23:07:02 fenn: I don't see how you can't have some minimal movement of the servo with a changing load 23:07:13 i.e. table scales 23:07:17 or some other nonsense 23:07:37 is this true, and if so, would that eliminate the jitter 23:07:41 unless deadband is a type of hysteres and the load it low 23:07:50 *is 23:07:51 toast: the mill at work uses resolvers on the servos(might be tachos) and feedback with linear scales 23:07:59 ah, so they're different items 23:08:18 anonimasu: resolvers, was that something that gives an analog sin/cos output? 23:08:21 yeah 23:08:25 ok 23:08:25 dmessier has joined #emc 23:08:27 I think it's tachos.. 23:08:35 crap, it's late 23:08:41 really 23:08:43 'night all 23:08:48 night lh 23:08:57 g'nite 23:08:57 could always make a HAL thing to control a fast tool servo 23:09:00 to correct the jitter 23:09:02 and Hi all 23:09:10 fast tool servo? 23:09:09 lerneaen_hydra has quit 23:09:19 toast: the jitter is between two encoder counts.. 23:09:31 anonimasu: there are a couple different types but the type i'm talking about is a piezoelectric actuator 23:09:31 or well a few.. depending on your pid.. 23:09:40 so that vibration or other position error 23:09:46 any thoughts on hoe a linear motor will react to EMC2??? 23:09:48 is cancelled out at the tool or some other spot 23:09:49 it's not position error.. 23:09:57 it's vibration into the axis, right? 23:10:04 it's so extremely little.. 23:10:15 ofcourse the coarser encoders the bigger it gets.. 23:10:18 it's still positioning error 23:10:35 skunkworks: i think mach steprate is actually faster than emc, or maybe that was turbocnc that was faster. anyway there is a stepper driver in tuxcnc that is faster than either of them, i dunno if it ever got integrated into emc 23:10:37 put a fast tool servo between the main servo and the leadscrew 23:10:44 have it watch the jitter and counteract it 23:10:47 analog 23:11:03 toast: the jitter is _extremely_ fast.. 23:11:13 the acuators are faster 23:11:18 but expensive 23:11:22 toast: how will you compute how much to actuate? 23:11:29 toast: is this actually a real problem? 23:11:28 analog tuning 23:11:34 yes, it's really in real machines 23:11:46 toast: tell me about what commercial machines that does this.. 23:11:55 dont bring diamond turning lathes into this.. 23:11:55 ultraprecice grinders, for one 23:12:05 semiconductor equipment 23:12:13 some microscopes 23:12:24 roll lathes use BIG ones 23:12:27 hydraulic 23:12:31 toast: if you have a 5000cpr encoder.. 23:12:34 to turn around keydrives 23:12:45 in quadrature that's 4x the amount of pulses.. 23:13:01 that's 20 000 counts per rev.. if I remember it right 23:13:14 let's say the jitter is 5 counts.. 23:13:18 sure 23:13:44 that's 360/20 000 23:14:05 *5 23:14:17 0.09 degrees 23:14:39 how is jitter going to be 5 counts? 23:14:50 fenn: it's probably more like 1 count.. 23:14:57 piezoelectric actuators can position in tenths of nanometers 23:15:01 fenn: bad pid loop.. 23:15:03 i thought it was <2 by definition 23:15:08 at very high frequencies 23:15:08 fenn: you are probably right 23:15:18 0.018 degrees in that case.. 23:15:24 that's how much the servo is ~ 23:15:50 if one rev of the leadscrew is 5mm 23:16:06 (5/360)*0.018 23:16:18 0.00005mm 23:16:29 it's obviously more than that if it's affecting surface finish 23:16:33 fenn: please correct my math is it's wrong.. 23:17:02 Ziegler has joined #emc 23:17:33 okay, so a millionth of an inch or so 23:17:52 yeah 23:17:57 a) that's a positioning error 23:18:07 and b) a fast tool servo will cancel it out 23:18:16 practically, they're used for surface finish 23:18:40 so you can use sub-par stuff in other parts of your machine, where you don't need real darn good true positioning 23:18:44 but want a nice surface finish 23:19:48 i'm not trying to make any sort of like, arguement here that people should be going out and buying all sorts of equipment 23:20:04 anonimasu: i get .0005mm 23:20:17 i'm just saying that there is that option out there 23:20:47 fenn: that's probably more accurate 23:20:58 that would def. affect visible surface finish 23:21:55 toast: well, I guess cnc machines arent good at all.. 23:22:00 huh? 23:22:15 cnc makes fast tool servos even better 23:22:16 yep cnc is crap 23:22:28 what is wrong with you people 23:22:31 because then you can develop comprehensive error maps 23:22:32 hehe 23:22:34 toast: I dont know of any cnc mill that does that kind of stuff.. or has a need to.. 23:22:52 okay, i said this in response to a grinder statement by nccams 23:23:11 toast: Okay, but what he really were talking about were stepper motors.. 23:23:30 not servo motors.. 23:23:41 all i am saying, and have been saying 23:23:51 is that fast tool systems are used to correct surface finish and small positioning errors 23:24:00 i don't know how this grew into "toasty hates cnc" 23:24:02 toast: what about active vibration damping? 23:24:04 and "no mills use it" 23:24:22 that damps vibrations, not necessarily positioning or asynchronous errors that would hurt surface finish 23:25:11 vibration isolation is certainly an excellent thing 23:25:18 yeah I see them in use in dtl's.. 23:25:37 they're used in all sorts of things! 23:25:38 even on big roll lathes! 23:26:10 wow nice tape reader skunkworks 23:26:12 semiconductor fabrication equipment 23:26:30 laser mirrors 23:26:58 i'm curious about active damping for hexapods 23:27:13 since they dont have the mass or cast iron, you need to use a hi-tech solution 23:27:23 hm, im curious about the actuation of them 23:27:24 when you say active damping, what parts of it do you want to damp 23:27:30 like viscoelastic shear or piezo actuators 23:27:49 toast: well, i mean put piezo actuators where the struts meet the platform 23:27:58 * anonimasu nods 23:28:00 i thought they were pretty stiff? 23:28:13 * fenn shrugs 23:28:45 what if $200 of vibration damping saves you $3000 in monstrous ballscrews 23:29:14 what you are describing IS a fast tool system 23:29:15 fenn: ? 23:29:20 yes 23:29:24 skunkworks: http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/frntcontroller.JPG 23:29:26 fenn: http://www.physikinstrumente.com/en/products/prdetail.php?sortnr=700800 23:30:04 anonimasu: that just uses servos doesnt it? 23:30:13 I dont know 23:30:23 Actuator Resolution to 0.005 µm 23:30:23 :D 23:30:23 ah - yes - we only used it for a bit before desciding it was for the birds. The computer (386sx) turned into the tape emulator. 23:30:30 the M-850 uses custom high-load precision screws and servo-motors 23:30:54 anonimasu: resolution doesnt mean active damping, you have to have the actuator bandwidth too 23:31:00 yeah 23:31:01 ofcourse 23:31:07 it were pretty good :) 23:31:19 200kg load capacity 23:31:28 piezos are several orders of magnitude faster than servos 23:31:48 they have one with screws or direct drive actuators 23:31:55 10000g acceleration i read in some article 23:31:59 which I think means piezoelectric/linearmotor 23:32:00 yep 23:32:03 that's right 23:32:08 no direct drive just means the motor is attached to the screw directly 23:32:19 ah, that way :/ 23:32:47 not sure that's an advantage either.. you get heat from the motor warping the screw 23:32:57 but it looks pretty :) 23:33:04 http://sfb528.tu-dresden.de/c3/4-Y%20Verzweigung%20mit%20HEXAPOD1_.jpg 23:33:27 the motor might be low temp 23:33:32 or they might be heated ballscrews 23:34:00 they might brag about it if they had such fancy stuff 23:34:07 but they dont 23:34:07 yep 23:34:09 perhaps! 23:34:41 toast: I think that it's just you :p no offence but you are precision insane.. 23:34:54 anonimasu: wood :( 23:35:01 anonimasu: it's kind of what i do? 23:35:11 i hate carpenters too 23:35:12 fenn: nist has one with plastic 23:35:14 me too 23:35:26 http://www.hskworld.com/hexapod_1.jpg 23:35:33 nist uses theirs for making aluminum calibration fixtures 23:35:44 linear motors?? 23:35:50 that thing is so ugly 23:35:54 looks like robbie the robot 23:36:18 toast: what? 23:36:31 huh? 23:36:43 01:38 < toast> anonimasu: it's kind of what i do? 23:36:52 he carps about precision 23:36:58 it's true, i do! 23:36:59 yeah :) 23:37:04 at work, that's the kind of stuff i do 23:37:08 http://tww.fh-duesseldorf.de/DOCS/FB/MUV/Hexapod.JPG 23:37:09 carp is the opposite of carpent 23:37:10 and that i'm getting into as a career 23:37:31 im happy if my parts are > 0.01mm 23:37:33 from where I want 23:37:40 eek 23:38:02 my current chafe is the lathe i've been working on will turn surfaces flat to 20 millionths 23:38:10 but the workholding warps them 23:38:32 18" rings 23:38:36 can emc do hexapod? 23:38:39 send it in the machine...LOL 23:38:50 ? 23:38:52 i could DO em 23:39:31 Ziegler: yes (at least they say it does) ;) 23:39:37 i Love tome tolerances...makes me remember why i am... 23:39:44 tome? 23:39:52 then 23:39:58 them 23:39:59 haha 23:40:03 is this hydraulic: http://sfb528.tu-dresden.de/c3/4-Y%20Verzweigung%20mit%20HEXAPOD1_.jpg 23:40:16 no 23:40:18 no 23:40:21 isn't it? 23:40:24 you see the motors on the side 23:40:25 I DO NOT KNOW 23:40:25 see the orange and green wires at the bottoms? 23:40:30 yeah 23:40:32 fingers are disfunctional this evening 23:40:32 big servos :) 23:40:37 oh, i thought those were servohydraulics 23:40:48 ick 23:40:55 sweeet 23:41:11 dmessier: we could do them too, if we redid the workholding 23:41:12 so what does a config look like for that??! 23:41:33 well, it could be hydraulic servos, but i dont see why you would do that in a research project - too fiddly 23:41:36 the problem is known, nobody wants to spend the time to make the chuck to hold the part 23:41:38 hydro-static cnc machines DO exist... MOOG-hydra-point...is 1 23:41:50 cincinati hydrotel 23:41:52 yes 23:42:01 so you need tool holding help?? 23:42:09 Ziegler: http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/emc2/configs/hexapod-sim/ 23:42:15 danke 23:42:23 dmessier: no, we know what the problem is and what the fix is 23:42:35 nobody will spend the man-hours to do it 23:43:01 it's in tolerance at present, so we're going to leave it 23:43:26 toast: nothing's perfect 23:43:31 it's just irritating to know the machine will do much better 23:43:34 heh 23:43:43 slap a plate on the lathe you are gonna use.. face it...c/bore to hold part.. drill hold down clamp holes and bolt FLAT.. 23:44:12 and when you clamp it 23:44:15 the part distorts 23:44:20 and you don't get it any flatter than when you started 23:44:32 it sits at 2 tenths 23:44:35 some fixture require retruing every set-up 23:45:05 X Y Z R P W ? 23:45:12 shim 1 side.. skim and flip and skim.. 23:45:28 can you?? 23:45:36 i'm seriously telling you 23:45:46 that doesn't work in the range the machine will do 23:46:08 we worked some part from both sides /001"-.002" at a time... 23:46:28 dmessier: 0.05mm right? 23:46:29 and got it parallel to 20 millionths? 23:46:47 .001-.002" tool nose radius... 23:46:53 ah ok 23:47:02 dmessier: what was your final flatness 23:47:01 shimming to millionths of an inch :( 23:47:13 you can't shim to millionths of an inch, that's the point 23:47:15 well, werm it with your hands.. 23:47:21 ;) 23:47:37 we also used mag chucks if we could.. once it was getting really flat.. 23:47:53 on aluminum? 23:48:30 well with enough power it'll work ;) 23:48:33 alum.. Titanium.. hardened 4340... made no differance to us 23:48:50 dmessier: you still haven't told me what your final, verified parallelism and flatness numbers were 23:48:51 hardinge superlant lathes 23:49:06 +/-.0001" 23:49:07 obviously it'll pull tools from the machines in the shop too 23:49:23 *grins* 23:49:25 night guys 23:49:30 dmessier: i'm getting +.0002/-.0000 23:49:43 4 micron finish 23:49:47 i want to get +.000020/-.000000 23:50:02 same stuff.. 23:50:07 uh, what? 23:50:14 how do you use magnetic chucks on aluminum? 23:50:22 dmessier: there's another zero 23:50:25 in there 23:50:25 some machines in that shop would do it.. 23:51:02 hookay 23:51:15 aluminum was a pain..but the best air chuck in japan is made in the usa 23:51:39 the proper fixture to turn to that accuracy 23:51:45 is a special kind of 2-part chuck 23:51:52 hardinge SUPER-precision... chnc II.. conquest 23:51:55 you can load it vertically, stress free 23:52:10 get all your torque values even and your part stress even 23:52:18 and measure it to make sure it didn't bend at all 23:52:31 then reconnect the chuck, and it will hold 23:52:49 map it... ive seen it done on 18' pcs.. not 18"... 23:53:12 20 millionths of an inch over 18'? 23:53:19 are you drunk? 23:53:31 ^_^ 23:53:45 no.. but to holg .0005" over 18'... you map it 23:54:02 okay but i'm not talking about .0005" over 18" 23:54:03 dmessier: you are missing a zero to get where toast is talking about 23:54:06 we can talk about baseball 23:54:12 if you want to talk about things that are not what i am talking about 23:54:24 i aint drunk.. im just drinkin'... ; )==~~~~ 23:54:23 .0005" 23:54:26 +.000020 23:54:30 .000020 23:54:32 err there.. 23:54:35 .0002 23:54:37 .00002 23:55:07 this is why we should use the metric system :P 23:55:12 fenn: thanks! 23:55:13 i'll convert it 23:55:22 can you grind it..?? 23:55:28 0.0508mm 23:55:34 .001 MM 23:55:35 grinding isn't as accurate as these lathes 23:55:43 anonimasu: .0005 mm 23:55:51 pls/... 23:55:51 toast: No. 23:55:53 heh anon that's wrong 23:55:56 that's what google said =( 23:55:59 *25.4 23:56:03 .00002 == .0005 23:56:03 mm 23:56:08 i am using google do not blame me! 23:56:20 1/2 micron... all you had to say 23:56:25 i don't know metric yet =( 23:56:33 at least know metric quickly 23:56:34 i am trying! 23:56:45 im BI 23:56:56 http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=0.00002+inch+to+mm&btnG=S%C3%B6k&meta= 23:57:10 si! 23:57:11 23:57:12 0.002 inch = 0.0508 millimeters 23:57:18 0.00002 inch = 0.000508 millimeters 23:57:22 yes! 23:57:25 that is what i said! 23:57:30 and what I said. 23:57:36 yaaay team 23:57:41 though I calced dmess's value first :) 23:57:53 it is so frustrating 23:57:58 it goes from "damn this is a nice lathe" 23:57:58 dmessier: well, you are off by almost a planet :/ 23:58:01 to "damn this is a crappy chuck" 23:58:12 toast: better get used to it :) 23:58:15 ok... so what material are you turning??? 23:58:20 6061 aluminum 23:59:09 stringy shite....tool nose rad?? 23:59:15 doesn't matter, it's diamond 23:59:23 pcd?? 23:59:24 yep 23:59:49 surface speed?? and tool holder type?? 23:59:57 dude, surface speed doesn't matter on diamonds