NEWS
LinuxCNC 2.5.2 Release
There are no translations available.

LinuxCNC 2.5.2 Update Released (changelog).
 
LinuxCNC 2.5.1 Release
There are no translations available.

LinuxCNC 2.5.1 Update Released (changelog). If the Package Manager does not prompt you to upgrade see this page.

 
LinuxCNC 2.5.0 Release
There are no translations available.

New major release (changelog). See the instructions to update your system from EMC 2.4 to LinuxCNC 2.5.
 
Home Forum Hardware CNC Machines esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 30 Mag 2012 07:44 #20508

  • BigJohnT
  • BigJohnT's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4955
  • Thank you received: 87
  • Karma: 134
I guess that depends on if your torch is high-dev or just an air torch. I'm happy if my position is <0.010 from commanded and in my case that would be due to belt stretch and other items as mine is stepper driven.

axis.N.f-error OUT FLOAT The actual following error

Not much to go on in the manual for that pin, I assume your watching that pin and iirc it is in machine units. When I tuned my CHNC I triggered on velocity and watched commaned vs actual and or following error as I adjusted the PID.

John
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 30 Mag 2012 07:59 #20509

  • jd896
  • jd896's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 88
  • Karma: 1
the commanded vs actual velocity are exact up to around 400mm/s but for small high speed jogs it shakes the gantry so ive taken it down to 250mm/s i think

so in the image the text at the side of F(0.02400) = 0.26509 does this after the = sign mean 0.26509mm?

and for now the power sources a powermax 85 till we get it burning most of the day and can warrant a fancy new hydef one

also what needs a fine tune to get that spike out is it d or ff2?
Last Edit: 30 Mag 2012 08:01 by jd896. Reason: no photo
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 30 Mag 2012 10:39 #20513

  • BigJohnT
  • BigJohnT's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4955
  • Thank you received: 87
  • Karma: 134
From memory I added P in small steps till the axis starts to become unstable then a tiny bit if I then repeat until the following error is small enough. Watch the following error with each change to see if your improved it or made it worse. I also added one of the FF's but forget which one... oh here it is.
# PID tuning params
DEADBAND =              0.000015
P =                     40
I =                     2
D =                     0.01
FF0 =                   0.01
FF1 =                   0.26
FF2 =			              0.0005
BIAS =                  0.000

Turns out I used a tiny bit of everything.

John
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 30 Mag 2012 23:27 #20522

  • jd896
  • jd896's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 88
  • Karma: 1
See this is what throws me every body else's parameters are like yours 40-60 on the p and such does it depend on the axis scaling ie encoder counts to axis movement as I cannot get my p above say 1 stably ATM it's around 0.9 with more d than I and I think there is still a bit much p as the scope is still quite course

Thanks for all your help john
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 31 Mag 2012 04:05 #20525

  • jd896
  • jd896's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 88
  • Karma: 1
afternoon lads just one quick question about this scope calibration method what kid of speeds do we want too be running at to tune the axis?

thanks
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re:esab ultrarex retro fit plasma / flame cutter 31 Mag 2012 04:27 #20526

  • PCW
  • PCW's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1651
  • Thank you received: 87
  • Karma: 116
PID parameters do depend on scaling but this can be factored out if desired by making the PID input and output commensurate. Since the input to the PID loop is in machine units and velocities are in machine units per second, for velocity mode servos, making th e DAC scale or output scale equal to machine units per second will make the units commensurate (this has the side benefit of making the FF1 term known = ~1 for velocity mode drives)

My guess as to why you have such small P term is that you have mm machine units so the input to the PID loop is larger than a inch machine (and the PID output units are probably somthing that has not be scaled to mm/sec
like 10V)
Last Edit: 31 Mag 2012 07:05 by PCW. Reason: ommision
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Moderators: cncbasher
Time to create page: 1.836 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
© 2013 LinuxCNC.org
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.