andypugh wrote:jmelson wrote:I went ahead and pushed, seems to be in the v2.5_branch tree, is
this the right place to be putting this?
Yes, that gets it in as a bugfix in 2.5, and it will then get merged into the dev branch in a day or so.
OK, I hope that VNR can test this, as I don't have an old enough board to test it here. But,
the problem was quite obvious, the velocity pin did not get created, and then the encoder
module tried to write a value to it.
I did test it with a USC and a UPC board, and it works fine in both cases, so it didn't
break anything (I think). If the lines were moved to the right place to satisfy C syntax,
I don't see how this code could go wrong.
Jon